Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market, 2024-2032

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market Size, Share, and Growth & By Application (Smart Contracts, Payment and Settlement, Product Traceability, Tracking, and Visibility, Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management), Organization Site (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Scale (SMEs) Enterprises); By Region (North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, Middle East & Africa, South America; Regional Outlook, Growth Potential and Segments Forecast 2024-2032.

The Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market size was USD $ 162 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD $ XX million by 2032, with a CAGR of 7 % during the forecast period.

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Overview

The global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market is witnessing significant growth as industries seek innovative solutions to enhance transparency, traceability, and efficiency in food production and distribution. Blockchain technology enables secure, decentralized record-keeping, providing real-time tracking of goods from farm to table. This fosters greater trust among consumers and stakeholders by ensuring the authenticity of products, reducing fraud, and improving food safety. In agriculture, blockchain is utilized for tracking crop data, verifying organic or fair-trade claims, and optimizing supply chain logistics. The food supply chain benefits from improved management of inventories, automated payment systems, and reducing food wastage by ensuring the accurate tracking of expiration dates and storage conditions. The increasing demand for organic and sustainably produced food, along with the need for compliance with food safety regulations, is driving adoption across key regions. Blockchain also supports smart contracts, automating various processes such as payments and shipment confirmations, further streamlining operations. Additionally, the market is being fueled by growing concerns over foodborne illnesses, which blockchain can help mitigate through improved traceability of contaminated products. As global food trade expands, blockchain facilitates seamless cross-border transactions, improving efficiency in global supply chains. Despite its promising benefits, the market faces challenges including the need for standardization, high implementation costs, and resistance to change from traditional players in the agricultural sector. However, with continued technological advancements and increased investments, blockchain’s role in transforming the agriculture and food supply chain is expected to become increasingly vital in the coming years.

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Growth Drivers

Increasing Need for Transparency and Traceability: The growing demand for transparency and traceability in the agricultural and food supply chains is a significant driver for blockchain adoption. Blockchain technology enables the creation of immutable, transparent records of every transaction along the supply chain, allowing consumers and stakeholders to trace the origin and journey of food products. This is particularly important as consumers demand more information about the ethical sourcing, sustainability, and quality of the food they purchase. By ensuring greater visibility and reducing fraud, blockchain can build trust, enhance accountability, and meet regulatory compliance requirements, thereby driving its adoption across the sector.

Enhancing Supply Chain Efficiency: Blockchain technology streamlines the food and agriculture supply chains by reducing paperwork, delays, and errors that often occur with traditional record-keeping methods. It allows for seamless, real-time data sharing among all stakeholders, including farmers, distributors, retailers, and consumers. With blockchain, agricultural and food supply chains can be optimized, minimizing operational costs and improving efficiency. This results in faster delivery times, reduced waste, and enhanced inventory management. As companies seek to improve productivity and reduce operational costs, blockchain emerges as a valuable tool to drive these improvements, boosting its adoption in the industry.

Rising Demand for Food Safety and Quality Assurance: The increasing demand for food safety and quality assurance is another significant growth driver for blockchain in the agriculture and food supply chain market. With the global food supply facing increasing risks from contamination, fraud, and quality control issues, blockchain's ability to provide a tamper-proof system for tracking and verifying food products becomes essential. The technology can record every step of food production, from farm to fork, ensuring that quality standards are met and regulatory compliance is maintained. This enhanced focus on food safety and the prevention of contamination outbreaks further accelerates the adoption of blockchain in the sector.

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Restraining Factors

High Initial Implementation Costs: One of the key restraints in the adoption of blockchain in agriculture and food supply chains is the high initial cost of implementation. Setting up a blockchain-based system requires significant investment in technology infrastructure, software, and training. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the agricultural sector may find it challenging to afford these initial expenses. Furthermore, the integration of blockchain into existing supply chain systems can be complex and time-consuming, adding to the overall cost. While long-term benefits such as efficiency gains and cost savings are realized, the upfront investment remains a significant barrier for widespread adoption.

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Opportunity Factors

Integration with IoT and AI for Smart Agriculture: The integration of blockchain with the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents significant opportunities for the agriculture and food supply chain market. IoT devices can collect real-time data from various stages of food production and transportation, which can then be securely recorded on a blockchain. AI can be used to analyze this data for predictive insights, helping optimize farming practices, supply chain logistics, and inventory management. Together, these technologies can create a smart agriculture ecosystem, improving efficiency, reducing waste, and enhancing sustainability, making blockchain a key enabler of innovation in the industry.

Government and Regulatory Support: Government policies and regulations supporting the adoption of blockchain in the agriculture and food supply chain sector present promising opportunities. As governments around the world recognize the potential of blockchain for improving transparency, traceability, and food safety, they are increasingly investing in and promoting its use. Regulatory bodies are also starting to develop frameworks that allow for the integration of blockchain in food safety and quality assurance processes. Government initiatives to encourage digital transformation in the agricultural sector, including grants and incentives for technology adoption, can accelerate blockchain integration and open new growth avenues for market players.

Consumer Demand for Sustainable and Ethical Practices: Consumer preferences are shifting towards sustainable and ethically sourced products, and blockchain provides a way for businesses to verify and showcase these practices. Blockchain's ability to track and validate sustainable farming methods, fair trade practices, and eco-friendly supply chains gives brands a competitive edge in the market. As consumers become more conscious of the environmental and social impact of their purchases, the demand for proof of ethical sourcing increases. Blockchain offers a powerful tool for businesses to meet these consumer demands, creating new market opportunities for companies that adopt and promote sustainable and responsible practices.

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Challenges

Lack of Industry Standardization: One of the major challenges facing the global blockchain in agriculture and food supply chain market is the lack of industry standardization. Different players in the supply chain often use disparate blockchain platforms and protocols, leading to interoperability issues. Without a unified standard for blockchain technology, integrating systems across various stakeholders (farmers, processors, distributors, retailers, and consumers) becomes difficult. This fragmentation can limit the effectiveness of blockchain applications, hindering widespread adoption. Establishing common standards and protocols across the industry will be crucial for ensuring smooth and seamless integration of blockchain into global food supply chains.

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Segment Insights

By Application: The application of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains is driving substantial growth, with key applications including smart contracts, payment and settlement, product traceability, tracking and visibility, and governance, risk, and compliance management. Smart contracts are revolutionizing transactions by automating processes and ensuring transparent agreements between parties. Payment and settlement systems powered by blockchain enhance financial transactions’ security and efficiency, especially in cross-border trade. Product traceability is gaining attention as blockchain provides a decentralized ledger, ensuring transparency from farm to table, which is crucial for both safety and quality assurance. Additionally, blockchain’s ability to offer real-time tracking and visibility boosts supply chain management by monitoring goods through each stage. Furthermore, governance, risk, and compliance management solutions enabled by blockchain improve regulatory adherence, mitigating risks and ensuring legal compliance, especially in the face of stringent food safety standards. As food safety concerns rise globally, these blockchain applications are becoming essential, promising to improve overall supply chain integrity.

By Organization Size: The blockchain market in agriculture and food supply chains is segmented by organization size into large enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Large enterprises are adopting blockchain at a rapid pace due to their robust capital, technological infrastructure, and the complexity of their supply chains. These organizations benefit from blockchain’s ability to streamline operations, enhance security, and reduce fraud. SMEs, on the other hand, are increasingly leveraging blockchain for cost-effective solutions that improve efficiency and transparency without needing significant investments in IT infrastructure. SMEs are particularly focused on cost-effective traceability and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. The adoption of blockchain among SMEs is being facilitated by emerging blockchain-as-a-service platforms, making it easier for smaller players to integrate this technology. Both large and small enterprises are exploring blockchain to address transparency issues, reduce fraud, and enhance product quality in the food supply chain.

By Region: The blockchain in agriculture and food supply chain market is seeing significant expansion across regions such as North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East & Africa, and South America. North America holds a dominant market share due to the presence of major technology players, robust agricultural industries, and advanced blockchain adoption. In the Asia Pacific region, rapid technological advancements, government support for digital transformation, and a vast agricultural base are driving blockchain growth, particularly in countries like China, India, and Japan. Europe is focusing on food safety, traceability, and compliance regulations, making blockchain adoption critical for enhancing transparency in the food supply chain. The Middle East & Africa is gradually adopting blockchain to improve food security and traceability, driven by the need to optimize supply chains and reduce fraud. South America, with its large agricultural sector, is also exploring blockchain to improve food production, traceability, and international trade efficiency. The adoption rate varies, but all regions are expected to witness significant growth as blockchain technology addresses key challenges in agricultural and food supply chain management globally.

Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Segmentation

By Application:

  • Smart Contracts
  • Payment and Settlement
  • Product Traceability
  • Tracking, and Visibility
  • Governance
  • Risk
  • Compliance Management
  • By Organization Size:

  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium Scale (SMEs) Enterprise
  • By Region:

  • North America
  • South America
  • Europe
  • Middle East and Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Key Market Players:

    1. IBM Corporation
    2. Microsoft
    3. SAP SE
    4. Ambrosus
    5. arc-net
    6. OriginTrail
    7. Ripe Technology INC
    8. VeChain Foundation
    9. Project Provenance Ltd.
    10. Chainvine Limited
    11. AgriChain Pty Ltd
    12. Chainvine Limited

    Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Recent Developments

    January 2023 – IBM's Partnership with Walmart and Others to Enhance Traceability: IBM has expanded its blockchain solutions in collaboration with Walmart, Dole, and others to enhance traceability in the food supply chain. This initiative allows consumers to track the journey of their food products from farm to table, addressing concerns about food safety, sustainability, and fraud prevention.

    October 2023 – SAP's Blockchain-Based Food Safety Program: SAP introduced a new blockchain-based program aimed at improving food safety. This program helps manufacturers and retailers trace the origin of products by providing real-time data on safety and authenticity, thus improving supply chain visibility and bolstering consumer trust in food sourcing.

    March 2024 – China Implements Blockchain in Agriculture: China is rapidly adopting blockchain technology in its agricultural supply chains, with heavy investment to ensure food safety and traceability. The government supports blockchain initiatives that track food authenticity and quality, particularly for exports, aiming to reduce fraud and contamination risks.

    May 2024 – Ambrosus Launches Food Safety Blockchain Platform: Ambrosus introduced a blockchain platform designed to improve food safety and quality by enabling real-time tracking from production to distribution. This solution addresses the growing demand for transparency in food sourcing and sustainability, integrating IoT devices and smart contracts to optimize supply chain management.

    Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market: Key Takeaways

    Enhanced Transparency and Traceability: Blockchain technology offers a secure, transparent ledger for tracking products from farm to table. This ensures the authenticity and traceability of food, helping to prevent fraud and improve consumer trust in the food supply chain.

    Optimized Data Management and Smart Farming: By integrating blockchain with IoT, farmers can capture and share real-time data on critical factors like soil conditions and weather. This improves decision-making, resource management, and overall productivity, making farming processes more efficient.

    Financial Inclusion for Smallholder Farmers: Blockchain reduces the need for intermediaries, providing smallholder farmers with direct access to markets. It also enables the use of smart contracts, ensuring fair payments and more efficient transactions, which boosts financial inclusion.

    Improved Food Safety and Rapid Response: With blockchain’s traceability features, it becomes easier to pinpoint the source of contamination during foodborne illness outbreaks. This facilitates quicker product recalls, ensuring food safety and reducing the impact of such incidents on consumers and producers.

    Frequently Asked Questions:

    How does blockchain improve transparency in the agricultural supply chain?
    Blockchain enhances transparency by providing an immutable, decentralized ledger where every transaction or step in the supply chain is recorded. This allows stakeholders (such as farmers, suppliers, processors, and consumers) to track products from farm to table, ensuring the authenticity and quality of the goods. With real-time access to this data, all parties can verify product origins, processing conditions, and handling, reducing fraud and enhancing trust in the system.

    What are the key benefits of using blockchain in food traceability?
    Blockchain offers several advantages in food traceability, including increased accuracy, reduced fraud, enhanced food safety, and faster response times during recalls. By allowing precise tracking of food items across the supply chain, it ensures that consumers and companies can quickly identify and isolate contaminated products. This helps maintain the integrity of the food supply and reduces the risks of foodborne illnesses.

    What challenges are faced when implementing blockchain in the agriculture and food supply chain?
    Despite its benefits, the implementation of blockchain in agriculture and food supply chains faces challenges such as high initial setup costs, the need for industry-wide collaboration, and technological barriers, especially in rural or developing areas with limited access to infrastructure. Additionally, integrating blockchain with existing supply chain systems and ensuring standardization across diverse stakeholders can be complex.

    1. Research Methodology
    1.1. Desk Research
    1.2. Real time insights and validation
    1.3. Forecast model
    1.4. Assumptions and forecast parameters
    1.4.1. Assumptions
    1.4.2. Forecast parameters
    1.5. Data sources
    1.5.1. Primary
    1.5.2. Secondary

    2. Executive Summary
    2.1. 360° summary
    2.2. By Organization Size
    2.3. By Application

    3. Market Overview
    3.1. Market segmentation & definitions
    3.2. Key takeaways
    3.2.1. Top investment pockets
    3.2.2. Top winning strategies
    3.3. Porter’s five forces analysis
    3.3.1. Bargaining power of consumers
    3.3.2. Bargaining power of suppliers
    3.3.3. Threat of new entrants
    3.3.4. Threat of substitutes
    3.3.5. Competitive rivalry in the market
    3.4. Market dynamics
    3.4.1. Drivers
    3.4.2. Restraints
    3.4.3. Opportunities
    3.5. Technology landscape
    3.6. Regulatory landscape
    3.7. Patent landscape
    3.8. Market value chain analysis
    3.9. Strategic overview

    4. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market By Organization Size,
    4.1. Large Enterprises
    4.1.1. Large Enterprises Market and forecast, by region, 2019-2032
    4.1.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    4.2. Small and Medium Scale (SMEs) Enterprises
    4.2.1. Small and Medium Scale (SMEs) Enterprises Market and forecast, by region, 2019-2032
    4.2.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032

    5. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market By Application
    5.1. Smart Contracts
    5.1.1. Smart Contracts market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    5.1.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    5.2. Payment and Settlement
    5.2.1. Payment and Settlement Market and forecast, by region, 2019-2032
    5.2.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    5.3. Tracking, and Visibility
    5.3.1. Tracking, and Visibility market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    5.3.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    5.4. Governance
    5.4.1. Governance Market and forecast, by region, 2019-2032
    5.4.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    5.5. Risk, and Compliance Management
    5.5.1. Risk, and Compliance Management market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    5.5.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032

    6. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market by Region
    6.1. North America
    6.1.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.1.2. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.1.3. U.S.
    6.1.3.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.1.4. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.1.4.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.1.5. Canada
    6.1.5.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.1.6. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.1.6.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.2. Europe
    6.2.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.2.2. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.2.3. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.2.4. Germany
    6.2.4.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.2.5. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.2.5.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.2.6. UK
    6.2.6.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.2.7. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.2.7.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.2.8. France
    6.2.8.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.2.9. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.2.9.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.2.10. Spain
    6.2.10.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.2.11. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.2.11.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.2.12. Italy
    6.2.12.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.2.13. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.2.13.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.2.14. Rest of Europe
    6.2.14.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.2.15. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.2.15.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.3. Asia Pacific
    6.3.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.3.2. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.3.3. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.3.4. China
    6.3.4.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.3.5. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.3.5.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.3.6. India
    6.3.6.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.3.7. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.3.7.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.3.8. Japan
    6.3.8.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.3.9. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.3.9.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.3.10. South Korea
    6.3.10.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.3.11. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.3.11.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.3.12. Australia
    6.3.12.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.3.13. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.3.13.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.3.14. Rest of Asia Pacific
    6.3.14.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.3.15. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.3.15.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.4. LAMEA
    6.4.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.4.2. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.4.3. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.4.4. Latin America
    6.4.4.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.4.5. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.4.5.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.4.6. Middle East
    6.4.6.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.4.7. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.4.7.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032
    6.4.8. Africa
    6.4.8.1. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Organization Size, 2019-2032
    6.4.9. Global Blockchain in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain Market and forecast, By Application, 2019-2032
    6.4.9.1. Comparative market share analysis, 2019 & 2032

    7. Company profiles
    7.1. IBM Corporation
    7.1.1. Business overview
    7.1.2. Financial performance
    7.1.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.1.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.1.5. SWOT analysis
    7.2. Microsoft
    7.2.1. Business overview
    7.2.2. Financial performance
    7.2.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.2.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.2.5. SWOT analysis
    7.3. SAP SE
    7.3.1. Business overview
    7.3.2. Financial performance
    7.3.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.3.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.3.5. SWOT analysis
    7.4. Ambrosus
    7.4.1. Business overview
    7.4.2. Financial performance
    7.4.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.4.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.4.5. SWOT analysis
    7.5. Arc.net
    7.5.1. Business overview
    7.5.2. Financial performance
    7.5.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.5.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.5.5. SWOT analysis
    7.6. OriginTrail
    7.6.1. Business overview
    7.6.2. Financial performance
    7.6.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.6.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.6.5. SWOT analysis
    7.7. Ripe Technology Inc
    7.7.1. Business overview
    7.7.2. Financial performance
    7.7.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.7.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.7.5. SWOT analysis
    7.8. VeChain Foundation
    7.8.1. Business overview
    7.8.2. Financial performance
    7.8.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.8.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.8.5. SWOT analysis
    7.9. Project Provenance Ltd.
    7.9.1. Business overview
    7.9.2. Financial performance
    7.9.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.9.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.9.5. SWOT analysis
    7.10. Chainvine Ltd
    7.10.1. Business overview
    7.10.2. Financial performance
    7.10.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.10.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.10.5. SWOT analysis
    7.11. AgriChain Pty Ltd
    7.11.1. Business overview
    7.11.2. Financial performance
    7.11.3. Product Type portfolio
    7.11.4. Recent strategic moves &Applications
    7.11.5. SWOT analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How can I pay for a report I want to purchase?

    You can conveniently pay for your desired report through the following payment options:

    1. Online Payment:
      • We accept major credit cards, including:
        • Visa
        • MasterCard
        • American Express
    2. Bank Wire Transfer:
      • If you prefer, we also offer the option to pay via bank wire transfer.

    Upon completing the payment process, a detailed invoice will be promptly sent to your email address. This email will serve as your official receipt for the purchased report. If you encounter any issues or require additional assistance, feel free to reach out to our team, and we’ll be happy to help.

    Our reports are accessible in various formats tailored to your needs:

    1. PDF Format:
      • Obtain a visually appealing and easily shareable PDF version of the report.
    2. PPT / Spreadsheet Format:
      • Delve deeper into the data with a presentation or spreadsheet format, allowing for easy analysis and customization.
    3. XLSX Format (Quantitative Data Only):
      • For those concentrating on quantitative data, we provide an XLSX format to facilitate detailed numerical analysis.

    Absolutely! You have the option to purchase individual sections of the report. Simply reach out to our dedicated sales representative, and they will assist you with your request. Feel free to contact our sales team, and they will guide you through the process of obtaining specific sections tailored to your needs.

    n adherence to industry standards, all sales are considered final, and payments made are non-refundable. This policy aligns with the unique nature of our business, where a report constitutes a transfer of our market knowledge and understanding.

    However, recognizing the importance of client satisfaction, we provide robust post-sales support, including:

    1. Author/Analyst Consultation:
      • Clients have the opportunity for a dedicated call-time with the author/analyst to address any queries or seek clarification regarding the report.
    2. Additional Data Points:
      • Post-purchase, clients can request additional data points, up to 10% of the report cost, free of charge.

    Exclusive Year-End Pricing:

    $1,999.00

    Premium Report Details

    Forecast Years: 2024-2032

    Base Year: 2023

    Historical Years: 2019-2022

    Companies Covered: 15-20

    Countries Covered: 15-20

    Tables & Figures: ~ 180

    Pages: ~ 200

    Request Sample